Twenty Years Of The Oscars – Best Actor Awards
Should they or was another actor more worthy? Was their performance truly for the ages, as an Academy Award winning performance should be, or a win to atone for losing […]
Should they or was another actor more worthy? Was their performance truly for the ages, as an Academy Award winning performance should be, or a win to atone for losing […]
Should they or was another actor more worthy? Was their performance truly for the ages, as an Academy Award winning performance should be, or a win to atone for losing a deserving award earlier in their career? Did they somehow become the flavour of the month during their film’s release and ride that wave all the way to Oscar night? Two biting examples from the nineties aptly display how silly the Academy can be with their choices. Roberto Benigni certainly did with his wretched mugging in ‘Life is Beautiful’ (1998), a film that managed to trivialise the Holocaust. Perhaps the win was sentimental, honouring their career, or previous performances? That was certainly the case of Al Pacino in ‘Scent of a Woman’ (1992), often recognised as one of the worst performances to actually win the Oscar. Pacino should have won years earlier for his magnificent performance in ‘The Godfather: Part II’ (1974), this was their (the Academy’s) way of making it right. Ridiculous!
So for the last twenty years, here are the Academy Award winners for Best Actor and whether or not they deserved it. For the record, I agree just seven times! Read on…
After losing for his riveting work in ‘The Insider’ (1999), the previous year, Crowe took home the Oscar in Gladiator. While he was very good, in no way was he stronger than Tom Hanks in ‘Cast Away’ who gave a performance for the ages and deserved to win a third time
Washington gives a truly towering performance as a dirty cop training a rookie, and yes, he is great. However, better than Gene Hackman in his career best performance in ‘The Royal Tanenbaum’? Nope, not even close.
Never understood this, the only explanation being Jack Nicholson (‘About Schmidt’) split the vote with Daniel Day-Lewis (‘Gangs of New York’) leaving Brody to pick up the votes he needed to win. Nicholson deserved his third award for Best Actor, his lonely widower was heartbreak and unlike any role he had ever played.m
Full agreement, brilliant, tortured performance from one of our greatest actors.
A decent impersonation but I never once felt I was experiencing Ray Charles. Now Paul Giamatti in ‘Sideways’? Extraordinary as an angry, struggling writer who loves wine. His monologue about his favourite wine is magnificent as he describes himself to a tee.
A strong performance but I think Toby Jones surpassed Hoffman a year later in ‘Infamous’ (2006) as Capote. For me Heath Ledger deserved the award as the taciturn, intensely quiet cowboy, in ‘Brokeback Mountain’. This, not ‘The Dark Knight’ was his greatest performance.
A brilliant seething performance from Whitaker as blood thirsty dictator Idi Amin. Whitaker captures his charisma, his forceful speaking to the masses but let’s us inside pure evil in a dark, frightening performance. No argument with his win.
Possibly the greatest male performance ever put on film. No argument!
Penn’s finest achievement as Harvey Milk the first openly gay man elected as a government official. Hope was his mantra, and in his joyous performance, goodness and hope explode out of him. Truly inspiring performance perfection. No arguments at all. Spectacular!
Really? Bridges wins a sentimental award only to give the years best performance the following year. Gotta love the Oscars! A far more deserving winner would have been Viggo Mortenson in ‘The Road’, as a broken father in the days of a post-apocalyptic event that has killed most life on earth. Mortenson was astounding in the film.
No great surprise that the well liked Firth won his Oscar for his fine performance as the speech impaired father of Elizabeth II. But Jeff Bridges, brilliant as Rooster Cogburn in ‘True Grit’ was a more deserving winner with his de-mythological performance. Authentic, superb!
My heart sank for George Clooney who gave his finest performance in ‘The Descendants’ and was a far more deserving performance. Hats off to Dujardin, he was charismatic in the silent film, and it is a great physical performance but Clooney stroked my soul.
Astounding, breathtaking, stunning, superb!
I cringe when I hear someone is due an Oscar. For me it must be earned with a performance for the ages, one that will stand the test of time. McConauhey had never been nominated before, how was he due? By far the best performance of the year was Leonardo Di Caprio in ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ as the raging screw up Jordan Belfort. In sixty years audiences will be worshipping at the feet of this exceptional performance. Brando great, which elevated Di Caprio to Acting God.
No question this is a very fine, demanding performance, a staggering physical challenge that Redmayne pulls off. But I always believed Michael Keaton in ‘Birdman’ found the soul of his actor trying to shake the stigma of having found fame as a super hero. Talk about method?
Put ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ on Android follow it with ‘The Revenant’ and try to convince me of the greatness of both performances. Di Caprio is near silent in ‘The Revenant’ but captures every bit of anguish, pain, and tortured recovery. A superb performance in a masterful film. No arguments!
One of the greatest performances in American film, Affleck is astonishing in his raw, visceral portrait of grief. No arguments!
Under layers of latex and a fat suit, Gary Oldman became Winston Churchill during WWII. It is never a bad performance but I wondered who was giving it, Oldman or the make up artists. Albert Finley and Brendan Gleason portrayed Churchill on HBO with life tied make up and where superior. A better choice would have been one of two non-nominated actors, James Franco in ‘The Disaster Artist’, or Christian Bale in ‘Hostiles’. They had no chance, Oldman was, ugh, due.
One of the worst Best Actor winners of the last twenty years, Malek somehow bagged an Oscar as Queen front man Freddie Mercury. Lip synching the songs, with distracting buck teeth, Malek, a fine actor “acted” all over the place. Viggo Mortensen gave the years best performance in ‘Green Book’, as a tough guy who befriends a black man as he drives him through the racist South.
A bizarre, often brilliant performance but did no one else find his jittering dancing repetitive and unnecessary? For me Adam Driver gave the years best performance in ‘Marriage Story’, though Adam Sandler in ‘Uncut Gems’ would have been a worthy winner too.
About The Author: